“The interest of the people is one thing: it is the public interest. And where the public interest governs, it is a government of laws and not of men.”
“The interest of a king or of a party is another thing: it is a private interest. And where private interest governs, it is a nation of men and not of laws.”
CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENSE
“I view great cities as pestilential to the morals, the health, and the liberties of man.”
EPISODE FIVE: Of Kings & Courts
“I agree with you in your opinion of cities. Cowper the poet very happily expresses our ideas of them compared with the country. ‘God made the country; man made cities.’ I consider them in the same light that I do abscesses on the human body – as reservoirs of all the impurities of a community.”
“Pure democracy cannot subsist long nor be carried far into the departments of state – it is very subject to caprice and the madness of popular rage.”
“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”xxvii
CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENSE
“A simple democracy is one of the greatest of evils. A democracy is a mobocracy.”xxviii
EPISODE FIVE: Of Kings & Courts
CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENSE
Most of Calvin Coolidge’s 1,203 Executive Orders were made to repeal Woodrow Wilson’s 1,803 Executive Orders.
“If the president alone was vested with the power of appointing all officers, and was left to select a council for himself, he would be liable to be deceived by flatterers and pretenders to patriotism, who would have no motive but their own emolument [self-seeking profit and gain].”
**********************************************
EPISODE FIVE: Of Kings & Courts
CONSTITUTIONAD DEFENSE
“…the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; …the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter; I mean so long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislature and the Executive… And it proves, in the last place, that as liberty can have nothing to fear from the judiciary alone, but would have every thing to fear from its union with either of the other departments; The judiciary… has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither force nor will, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.”
EPISODE FIVE: Of Kings & Courts
“The provision of the act of 1867, affirming the appellate jurisdiction of this court in cases of habeas corpus is expressly repealed. It is hardly possible to imagine a plainer instance of positive exception. We are not at liberty to inquire into the motives of the legislature. We can only examine into its power under the Constitution; and the power to make exceptions to the appellate jurisdiction of this court is given by express words. Without jurisdiction the court cannot proceed at all in any cause… It is quite clear, therefore, that this court cannot proceed to pronounce judgment in this case, for it has no longer jurisdiction of the appeal; and judicial duty is not less fitly performed by declining ungranted jurisdiction than in exercising firmly that which the Constitution and the laws confer.”
CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENSE
Judges have been impeached for:
EPISODE FIVE: Of Kings & Courts
“It is quite foreign from the nature of the judiciary’s office to make them judges of the policy of public measures.”
[T]he opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves, in their own sphere of action, but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch.xxviii
CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENSE
The Constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist, and shape into any form they please.xxix
Nothing has yet been offered to invalidate the doctrine that the meaning of the Constitution may as well be ascertained by the Legislative as by the Judicial authority.xxx
“Members of this court are vested with the authority to interpret the law; we possess neither the expertise nor the prerogative to make policy judgments. Those decisions are entrusted to our Nation’s elected leaders, who can be thrown out of office if the people disagree with them. It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.”
EPISODE FIVE: Of Kings & Courts
EPISODE FIVE TAKE AWAYS:
CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENSE